Good day.

I am learning Ruby 1.9 in the Ruby Programming Language book by Flanagan and Matsumoto. So, I am interested in the exercises following the example of those that were in Kernighan's "C programming language" and Ritchie, but oriented to the specifics of Ruby.

Closed due to the fact that it is necessary to reformulate the question so that it was possible to give an objectively correct answer by the participants cheops , Kromster , aleksandr barakin , PashaPash ♦ 4 Sep '16 at 7:29 .

The question gives rise to endless debates and discussions based not on knowledge, but on opinions. To get an answer, rephrase your question so that it can be given an unambiguously correct answer, or delete the question altogether. If the question can be reformulated according to the rules set out in the certificate , edit it .

    2 answers 2

    • Interesting, thanks. - Gray
    • The tasks there are so simple that my grandmother, who also once programmed, would cope with them. True, on punched cards)) - Bandicoot87
    • 2
      And how does punch card programming differ from programming on playing cards? I thought that in the era of punched cards programmed in some languages, well, at least, machine codes, and here, it turns out they can also be programmed - alexlz

    Rubykoans

    Rubymonk

    Rubytapas