Slowly doing the above site control panel for the engine. Since I can directly change the code, there is no special need for the panel. But I want to do and do well.

Which CMS do you think the control panel is perfect for? I would like to "touch" them and do something similar.

Closed due to the fact that it was off topic by participants aleksandr barakin , BogolyubskiyAlexey , Max Mikheyenko , Visman , Peter Olson October 16 '15 at 2:49 .

It seems that this question does not correspond to the subject of the site. Those who voted to close it indicated the following reason:

  • " Questionnaires are forbidden on Stack Overflow in Russian . To get an answer, rephrase your question so that it can be given an unambiguously correct answer." - aleksandr barakin, BogolyubskiyAlexey, Max Mikheyenko, Visman, Peter Olson
If the question can be reformulated according to the rules set out in the certificate , edit it .

  • By the way, what does the "control panel for the engine" mean? - huffman
  • some tool that would allow a person unfamiliar with programming to customize and edit a site. - oleg_ismaylov
  • Bitrix. In our company, only he got accustomed. All were able to work and marketers and PR. The main thing is to tell, show. - huffman
  • one
    Well, for example ucoz ^^ - lampa
  • Yes, I have an intuitively clear reference to where to edit) - IVsevolod

4 answers 4

UMI.CMS has a pretty nice admin panel, but the system itself has been wildly inhibited for now. In the bitrix admin, I didn’t understand anything at all, and the template engine is dumb. In principle, hostcms as I saw it, I liked the ability to edit templates from the admin panel, although it is not safe, but sometimes it is very useful.

  • @Deadik, Bitrix needs to be addressed. Since we are all programmers here it is easier for us to write our own than to study someone else's -) - huffman
  • one
    Well, lately, I am increasingly inclined to think that box systems in general need to be slowly abandoned, otherwise their “universality” makes them very slow - Deadik
  • one
    @huffman, this is the bitrix. No matter what the market requires. - vkovalchuk88
  • one
    @huffman I absolutely agree, we are now collecting sites only on boxes, the market requires quick implementation. However, this is not required by the entire market, there is a narrower segment that requires a more competent approach to architecture, where the use of a boxed solution is simply unacceptable and you need to grow professionally to the level of such projects, and for this you should gradually abandon CMS. - Deadik
  • one
    @Deadik, so no one says let's do everything out of the box. We are in a dispute he forgot the question. "Examples of CMS with an excellent control panel. In your opinion." In my opinion this is Bitrix! - huffman

the ideal control panel is the missing control panel. that's my thought.

but this is all subjective. do as you imagine yourself.

  • If in my case, then yes. I can directly code the code. And if I make a website for someone far from coding? - oleg_ismaylov

I like Netcat. (This is a paid cis, but they have free demos, so you can look at this cis from the inside).

  • Not even worthy of watching her - habrahabr.ru/post/37647 - vkovalchuk88
  • Well, let's say I will not argue that this is a fucking system, but an article on HabrĂ© from 2008, and since then there have already been a lot of things written in this CMS. - Heidel
  • @ vkovalchuk88, I would, if I were you, pay attention to the date of the article "August 21, 2008 at 1:17 pm" since NetCat has been a good hairdo. Why do I say that? Because not so long ago I worked with this CMS. This is certainly not Bitrix but not bad either. - huffman
  • @huffman, OK, I'll check. But bitrix is ​​crutches. - vkovalchuk88
  • @ vkovalchuk88, about the bitrix does not agree with you. When did you last touch him? I touched the latest version of months ago. Everything there is quite worthy. - huffman

Bitrix.

  • 2
    Very bad. - vkovalchuk88
  • what is bad? So that you yourself can not do this? -) - huffman
  • @ vkovalchuk88, well, offer your own or disprove, but with explanations. In my opinion, Bitrix is ​​good, but too small for a small project. Everything in it is thought out for optimization, it keeps up with the times. The people who develop it are not stupid, if some components of the users were not satisfied, they would not have written. True, I didn’t break my leg in it until I figured out what was happening, but it was a matter of habit. I used many of his “lotions” on my engine. Although some of the administered modules that I need to develop sites, it does not. - NoName
  • @MyNameIs, global $ SHOWIMAGEFIRST; $ SHOWIMAGEFIRST = true; $ this-> content. = '<table width = "100%" cellspacing = "4" cellpadding = "8">'; Whatever was not a beautiful gossip SMS, it remains govnododerskoy. No need to watch it. - vkovalchuk88
  • one
    CMS rating for the first half of 2013 cmsmagazine.ru/news/news_company/4023 1C-Bitrix still leads in the rating of paid CMS, increasing its share by 2.5%, which in the end was 57.23%. NetCat holds the second place with a score of 11.56%, losing 4.71%. HostCMS closes the top three with a score of 10.18%, a loss compared to last year was 0.39%. - huffman