Solid design - it is only the background, header and markup of articles, menu for the site? Or something else?
Closed due to the fact that the issue is too general for the participants of Kromster , aleksandr barakin , katso , Denis , HamSter Nov 1 , '96 at 9:59 .
Please correct the question so that it describes the specific problem with sufficient detail to determine the appropriate answer. Do not ask a few questions at once. See “How to ask a good question?” For clarification. If the question can be reformulated according to the rules set out in the certificate , edit it .
2 answers
This is the convenience of using the final product. the design is not “pictures” with “effects”, it is a visual, technical, ergonomic solution of the problem.
fed
It is very difficult - depending on what is considered good. Some designers make it so that the most minimalistic design looks beautiful and tasteful, and sometimes the most loaded (graphically) sites are drawn quickly, weigh a little and please the eye. In my opinion, the main thing is to accurately relate usability and graphics so that it is ergonomic. http://www.premiumpixels.com/ - as an example