There is a repository for bitbakt. It is necessary that another person who has only read rights could create a branch, do something in it and send a pull request. Is it possible? Is it possible without a repository for the Fork?

Update

Ideally, locomno komitil, and then created a pool rekvest, which will be visible on the beatback without branches and forks. I understand that a stupid question, but is it really so? Or so that he himself created a branch locally, and then add it to the pullrequest.

  • Updated the question - or8it

3 answers 3

Changes must be stored somewhere. If not in the fork, then where? The @ 0xFFh option is good enough.

And why do you want to do without forks? It's just not entirely clear: on the one hand, a person does not have rights to change the original repository, on the other hand, I do not want forks. Some strange situation. How does it work with the code?

    You can manually create a branch and set it with the appropriate permissions for pull / push operations.

      You can limit the rights to change a specific branch of the repository (most likely master). At the same time, other employees should be given the right to write to all other branches. Employees will be able to store the code in the main repository, without creating forks, but will not be able to change the main branch.