Good day.

There is a need to write under the .NET Framework 1.0, because He defaults in 2003 \ XP. But he is absent from my VS.

  1. How to write at all? Where can I find the info?

  2. Is it compatible with new versions of dotnet? Those. Will the software work in Vista and higher?

PS If there are those who wrote under 1.0, please share your experience. What VS wrote, nuances, etc.

    1 answer 1

    I advise you to write in this case under .NET 2.0. By default in XP no .NET is not worth it. Here pruflink - https://clck.ru/9ShnB

    At the same time, .NET at least version 2.0 really stands on almost every XP machine.

    If you need a 100% direct guarantee, I don’t even know ... Maybe I should write on VB 6.0?

    • I would like to go into exactly 1.0 - Alexis
    • one
      > I would like to understand exactly 1.0 why do you need it? This is a piece of shit..pardon..code that was not supported by anyone long ago and nobody needs it - DreamChild
    • @DreamChild, At least loader \ installer dotnet 2.0 to do. - Alexis
    • I don't know what the specifics of your tasks are, but I very much doubt that .NET is a must-have component. This is indirectly indicated by the fact that you were even ready to downgrade to .NET 1.0. If you need a language with garbage collection and convenient data structures, you can consider other options, from Go to Lua, from Julia to Euphoria. This is the best way to avoid all these problems with dotnet versions. If you really need exactly, then here is stackoverflow.com/questions/6090913/… - VadimTukaev
    • one
      > At least loader \ installer dotnet 2.0 to do. I may not understand something, but why all this? Are you ready to abandon the minimum supported and sane version of .NET just for the sake of the installer? Yes, spit on it and give the user a warning that, say, man, if you want to run my program, then download the framework from at least the Middle Ages, and not from the Stone Age. - DreamChild