Is Basic HTTP authentication, Digest HTTP authentication popular?

Or is it better to do your version of authentication, then how have these public ones studied those who need it under a microscope for a long time and easily bypass them?

Closed due to the fact that it is necessary to reformulate the question so that it was possible to give an objectively correct answer by the participants Nick Volynkin ♦ , tutankhamun , Suvitruf ♦ , Mike , PashaPash ♦ 21 December '15 at 16:40 .

The question gives rise to endless debates and discussions based not on knowledge, but on opinions. To get an answer, rephrase your question so that it can be given an unambiguously correct answer, or delete the question altogether. If the question can be reformulated according to the rules set out in the certificate , edit it .

  • 2
    If you mean that at the http level, they are not used because the window that the browser displays does not fit into the design. - Mike
  • one
    It depends on where and depending on the capabilities of the server | browser. The choice on the case itself is not big. For example, Form-based is used on the Internet, because, as Mike said, the other does not fit into the design. In the corporate network, NTML can be stirred up or even under certain circumstances kerberos - Sergey 4:52 pm
  • The answer depends on what is meant by “popularity.” and under "easy." basic and digest "bypass" can not be. They are unsafe for other reasons - which are easily leveled using https. - PashaPash ♦ 4:39 pm

0