And what are the advantages of a turnkey solution? What safer your cms or ready?

Closed due to the fact that it is necessary to reformulate the question so that it was possible to give an objectively correct answer by the participants of Streletz , cheops , user194374, aleksandr barakin , enzo 26 Jun '16 at 4:29 .

The question gives rise to endless debates and discussions based not on knowledge, but on opinions. To get an answer, rephrase your question so that it can be given an unambiguously correct answer, or delete the question altogether. If the question can be reformulated according to the rules set out in the certificate , edit it .

1 answer 1

Pros of your cms:

  • You yourself wrote a cms, it improves, you can write it in a portfolio.
  • learned a lot of new.
  • Perhaps, cms can consume a minimum of resources, since there is no excess.
  • Most likely there are no bookmarks.
  • Hacking a third-party violidist makes it a little difficult - it does not have ready-made scripts.

Cons of your cms:

  • It needs to be written and fixed. Find specialists on it will be difficult.
  • It is possible that there are errors in it, perhaps rude and childish.

Pluses of third-party popular cms:

  • Most likely you can make a working decision in a couple of hours.
  • You can find many people who have worked with her and can help solve the problem.
  • There are many scripts and recipes for various occasions.
  • actively checked by the community for vulnerabilities and fix.

Cons third-party popular cms:

  • if you find a vulnerability, then most likely they can quickly be hacked in "automatic mode"
  • there is no guarantee that there are no backdoors and sores
  • extensions may have additional snags.
  • what is chsv? - user33274
  • 2
    @LenovoID, Feeling Great Majesty / Importance. - user207618 8:50 pm