A spontaneous question arose whether there were any differences between these entries:

Stylus version:

@font-face font-family Avante src: url('../fonts/AvanteRegular.woff') format('woff') font-style normal @font-face font-family Avante src: url('../fonts/AvanteRegular.woff2') format('woff2') font-style normal

AND:

 @font-face font-family Avante src: url('../fonts/AvanteRegular.woff') format('woff'), url('../fonts/AvanteRegular.woff2') format('woff2') font-style normal

CSS version:

 @font-face { font-family: Avante; font-style: normal; src: url('../fonts/AvanteRegular.woff') format('woff'); } @font-face { font-family: Avante; font-style: normal; src: url('../fonts/AvanteRegular.woff2') format('woff2'); }

AND:

 @font-face { font-family: Avante; font-style: normal; src: url('../fonts/AvanteRegular.woff') format('woff'), url('../fonts/AvanteRegular.woff2') format('woff2'); }

Will there be problems connecting an alternate font when using the first option?

    1 answer 1

    There is: in the first version of the lines more. And in terms of connectivity, there is no difference.