What do you think is faster than joomla or WP ? And how many queries to the database performs joomla and WP ? And then I have Joomla , without unnecessary plug-ins, the hoster is sometimes buggy, I write to him - he says that the site needs to be optimized in terms of queries to the database. For me, Joomla is faster than WP . I don’t know what is loaded in WP there , but sometimes it opens up on a local computer just barely, and then it’s necessary to overload the computer so that the site is loaded onto WP , and locally. With Joomla fewer problems, but WP seems to me more convenient for "juzverej." I am pleased to hear your criticism and not criticism, the comparison of engine data.

PS: I put my fingers to all who respond well

  • @Expert came and spoiled all the arts. = (By the way, since I edited it, why didn't you change the comment in PS? It turned out that @mctrane wanted to index the postscriptum word? - knes
  • I had to remove this ps = ( - iproger

1 answer 1

Faster WordPress. But nominally, in Joomla it is necessary to make fewer movements to achieve a greater number of whistles and ryushechek, since there are more than 100,500 modules there. In general, it is strange to compare them. Maybe I have outdated data, of course, but for me this is a CMS for completely different tasks.

  • Tasks are different, but there are common tasks. Some sites can be made equally comfortable on both joomla and wordpress. - iproger
  • If it can be done equally conveniently, use WP. - knes