| He made a fresh design, using jQuery, decided to give complete freedom to the user, and muddled up the site display control unit, increasing the font, color schemes, removing the sidebar, changing the background image. But I was told that this is stupid and not at all fashionable now, this is not relevant and no one will use the unit, the main thing is simplicity, not usability. The block leaves around the corner for a hover event and does not interfere in principle, the only difficulty is to edit each topic with any changes in the main one. The idea came after reading [this article] (http://www.w3school.ru/blog/design-showcase/style-switchers-are-back-ideas-examples.html) For some reason it is not condemned abroad, and the main it is used in home pages and design studios to "show their power over style" =) What do you think? | ![]() |
6 answers
In such a chip, there is a sense on large portals, such as yandex, google, yahoo, which people use every day, and therefore there is a sense in customizing which to your taste. But in any case, this should not be some kind of traveling panel, but at the maximum a link like "Customize the look of the site."
- In my opinion, it is in large portals, especially Google, that such a chip is not appropriate at all, the style of the portals that are used every day should be uniform and recognizable, and giving the user "cSS freedom" would not be suitable for such an international giant. And I'm not talking about Yandex, it seems to me it's time for them to change the design. - chuikoff
And what's the point? In fact, this does not add functionality to the site (IMHO, it’s unlikely that anyone will be able to customize the site display, so try it once again).
But where it would be really useful is on a specialized portal with a direction to the layout, or design, or something else. When it appears exactly the purpose of use, different from "to play." Otherwise, it's just a design that is too overloaded with frills.
But as your personal trick, this unit could have taken place! Only in a smaller size, or used for other purposes (for example, access to the "quick settings" of your site, but not only the appearance, although something is not excluded here), IMHO.
And I did not understand people who scream everywhere that it is not fashionable or stupid.
- This feature was created for the blog. To make it more readable. - chuikoff
- Hmm, I didn't even think about the blog. In my opinion it is worth doing, only it is necessary somehow unobtrusively and compactly. For me it would be convenient. IMHO. - Dex
I think it makes sense to change the font, for the unthinkable, and reset your entire invented design to "default minimalism", where in black and white and without any whistles and p..ok, for example, do you like the same color scheme, but there are people who these colors are either not perceived at all, the so-called color blindness, or simply annoying this color.
- I think that does not make sense. It is necessary to make a normal design and without unnecessary whistles, if you do not know how - you are a poor designer. And the user edit is nothing to do with. In addition, stylebot has long given such functionality to anyone who really needs it. - Sergey
Just this panel - bust.
The font is done more by pressing Ctrl + + or the mouse wheel, it works in any browser, and this is what the user will do first thing and not look for the panel. So it is better to check that the site is sailing normally, and nothing climbs anywhere.
On the sidebar a small arrow is hung in the upper corner that hides and reveals it as in google maps, and then, this is not always necessary.
Themes, if screwed, are usually small color schemes that overload a small piece of styles, such as: background caps, background color and links. Everything. In no way should you change the interface in a coordinated manner.
Senseless bullshit. If you can not make a normal design to the site - this is for you a minus. Giving the user his change is the height of stupidity. Maximum you can give a few topics to choose from. And so you just litter the site with extra functionality. It's like in the terminal to make it possible to listen to music through headphones.
- And what is the difference between the choice of topics, and the choice of displaying the same topic in different colors:? Again, I repeat, the site design should be uniform and recognizable, allowing you to change themes, this is a chance for the user to forget what your main site design looks like. Abroad (link in 1 post) it is well practiced. ZY it was unpleasant to hear the phrase the height of stupidity, I did not come here for insults, but for an answer and advice. - chuikoff
- It is regrettable that you are not able to perceive criticism in your address when you ask how good your idea is. 1-3 design to choose from give the user to choose the most convenient of them, at the same time you do not let him do the garbage from your site thereby spoil the sensations from him. - Sergey
Do not listen to anyone, make this chip, but not as the main one in your site. Very small and inconspicuous, and never make it travel from somewhere, otherwise it looks like an advertisement.
If you really want to - make one small button, and in the section itself you can even do this:
